Perturbative operator approach to high-precision light-pulse atom interferometry

Light-pulse atom interferometers are powerful quantum sensors, however, their accuracy for example in tests of the weak equivalence principle is limited by various spurious influences like magnetic stray fields or blackbody radiation. Pushing the accuracy therefore requires a detailed assessment of the size of such deleterious effects. Here, we present a systematic operator expansion to obtain phase shifts and contrast analytically in powers of the perturbation. The result can either be employed for robust straightforward order-of-magnitude estimates or for rigorous calculations. Together with general conditions for the validity of the approach, we provide a particularly useful formula for the phase including wave-packet effects

Universality-of-Clock-Rates Test using Atom Interferometry with T3T^{3} Scaling

We propose a competitive quantum test of the universality of clock rates that depends on the proper time of a freely-falling particle, scaling cubic with the laboratory time. In contrast to current tests with fountain clocks, our proposed atom-interferometric scheme can be made robust against initial conditions and recoil effects, making optical frequencies accessible even for long interferometer durations. We study the influence of parasitic effects and discuss implementations with strontium isotopes that may even outperform current tests with fountain clocks.Comment: 9 pages, 3 figures, 1 tabl

Cutting multi-control quantum gates with ZX calculus

Circuit cutting, the decomposition of a quantum circuit into independent partitions, has become a promising avenue towards experiments with larger quantum circuits in the noisy-intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) era. While previous work focused on cutting qubit wires or two-qubit gates, in this work we introduce a method for cutting multi-controlled Z gates. We construct a decomposition and prove the upper bound $\mathcal{O}(6^{2K})$ on the associated sampling overhead, where $K$ is the number of cuts in the circuit. This bound is independent of the number of control qubits but can be further reduced to $\mathcal{O}(4.5^{2K})$ for the special case of CCZ gates. Furthermore, we evaluate our proposal on IBM hardware and experimentally show noise resilience due to the strong reduction of CNOT gates in the cut circuits

A Survey on Quantum Reinforcement Learning

Quantum reinforcement learning is an emerging field at the intersection of quantum computing and machine learning. While we intend to provide a broad overview of the literature on quantum reinforcement learning (our interpretation of this term will be clarified below), we put particular emphasis on recent developments. With a focus on already available noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, these include variational quantum circuits acting as function approximators in an otherwise classical reinforcement learning setting. In addition, we survey quantum reinforcement learning algorithms based on future fault-tolerant hardware, some of which come with a provable quantum advantage. We provide both a birds-eye-view of the field, as well as summaries and reviews for selected parts of the literature.Comment: 62 pages, 16 figure

Interference of Clocks: A Quantum Twin Paradox

The phase of matter waves depends on proper time and is therefore susceptible to special-relativistic (kinematic) and gravitational time dilation (redshift). Hence, it is conceivable that atom interferometers measure general-relativistic time-dilation effects. In contrast to this intuition, we show that light-pulse interferometers without internal transitions are not sensitive to gravitational time dilation, whereas they can constitute a quantum version of the special-relativistic twin paradox. We propose an interferometer geometry isolating the effect that can be used for quantum-clock interferometry.Comment: 9 Pages, 2 Figure

Uncovering Instabilities in Variational-Quantum Deep Q-Networks

Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) has considerably advanced over the past decade. At the same time, state-of-the-art RL algorithms require a large computational budget in terms of training time to converge. Recent work has started to approach this problem through the lens of quantum computing, which promises theoretical speed-ups for several traditionally hard tasks. In this work, we examine a class of hybrid quantum-classical RL algorithms that we collectively refer to as variational quantum deep Q-networks (VQ-DQN). We show that VQ-DQN approaches are subject to instabilities that cause the learned policy to diverge, study the extent to which this afflicts reproduciblity of established results based on classical simulation, and perform systematic experiments to identify potential explanations for the observed instabilities. Additionally, and in contrast to most existing work on quantum reinforcement learning, we execute RL algorithms on an actual quantum processing unit (an IBM Quantum Device) and investigate differences in behaviour between simulated and physical quantum systems that suffer from implementation deficiencies. Our experiments show that, contrary to opposite claims in the literature, it cannot be conclusively decided if known quantum approaches, even if simulated without physical imperfections, can provide an advantage as compared to classical approaches. Finally, we provide a robust, universal and well-tested implementation of VQ-DQN as a reproducible testbed for future experiments.Comment: Authors Maja Franz, Lucas Wolf, Maniraman Periyasamy contributed equally (name order randomised). To be published in the Journal of The Franklin Institut

Atom-interferometric test of the universality of gravitational redshift and free fall

Light-pulse atom interferometers constitute powerful quantum sensors for inertial forces. They are based on delocalised spatial superpositions and the combination with internal transitions directly links them to atomic clocks. Since classical tests of the gravitational redshift are based on a comparison of two clocks localised at different positions under gravity, it is promising to explore whether the aforementioned interferometers constitute a competitive alternative for tests of general relativity. Here we present a specific geometry which together with state transitions leads to a scheme that is concurrently sensitive to both violations of the universality of free fall and gravitational redshift, two premises of general relativity. The proposed interferometer does not rely on a superposition of internal states, but merely on transitions between them, and therefore generalises the concept of physical atomic clocks and quantum-clock interferometry. An experimental realisation seems feasible with already demonstrated techniques in state-of-the-art facilities.Comment: 8 pages, 4 figure

Theoretical approach to high-precision atom interferometry

The wave properties of matter in quantum mechanics first postulated by de Broglie in 1923 as well as Einstein’s theory of general relativity have radically changed our perception of the world at the beginning of the twentieth century. While each theory is extremely successful and well tested within its range of validity, a unification of both theories has so far resisted any attempt. However, the advances in precision of modern matter-wave interferometers have paved the way to designing experiments at the interface of gravity and quantum mechanics. Indeed, quantum mechanical devices are on the brink of becoming sensitive enough to challenge predictions of general relativity such as the weak equivalence principle or set bounds on alternative gravitational theories. Reaching sensitivities required for these experiments necessitates a careful assessment of deleterious effects some of which might be atom-atom interactions or the influence of the gravitational potential of the laboratory setup itself. Estimation of the size of such effects calls for refined theoretical tools for the description of light-pulse atom interferometry which is the subject of the present thesis

Reply to “Comment on ‘Perturbative operator approach to high-precision light-pulse atom interferometry’ ”

Recently, we introduced [C. Ufrecht and E. Giese, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053615 (2020)] a technique to calculate the phase of light-pulse atom interferometers caused by the presence of perturbation potentials and underlined its power by an illustrative example. In the preceding Comment [B. Dubetsky, Phys. Rev. A 102, 027301 (2020)], it was pointed out that other, less idealized situations could have been calculated as well. Our Reply emphasizes that our method is correct, the results from our example can be trivially generalized to other perturbations, and intricate effects of local environments can be even more prominent but also treated by our technique